🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an celebration that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has developed a corporate feel, expanding to include gatherings where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to talk to predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the enterprise of demonstrating racial awareness. Yet, that phase is now over. The wave has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

Initially celebrated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Holland.

The month has evolved since those days, placing less emphasis on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and more on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the celebration is observed is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how important it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the specific period in which it takes place this year. In the Britain, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in British history. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a place where a member of parliament feels empowered to say that a lack of white people in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, far-right parties are surging in the EU as a entirety.

In the America, a significant offensive against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been carried, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A drive to erase African American heritage and narrative from the records is under way. One of the former president's early administrative commands focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the celebration symbolises how little it can be influential if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered festivities of contributions in the past, rather than challenging the situation of the present. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is required. An academic expert, a professor at a learning establishment, put it best when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just discontinue things like Black History Month entirely, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an time that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an framework that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed through the year (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a period that does not shy away from political issues, and leaves space for citizens, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What value has basic knowledge of the history when it fails to address the contemporary truth of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Organizations who mark it should not be pacified with the passive language of hidden discrimination and awareness of subtle slights, but faced with the threats that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and responsive. Perhaps an total re-identification is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.